Re: WebVTT spec

On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 9:16 PM, Michael[tm] Smith <mike@w3.org> wrote:

> Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>, 2013-03-12 11:18 +1100:
>
> > I'll let you know when I'm set up to take this over. I'll work through
> the
> > publishing pipeline with Robin and Mike. I agree that a stage is the
> first
> > step. Mike also asked me to move to using ReSpec,
>
> If you understood me as asking you to move to ReSpec than I think I must
> have miscommunicated. I think you asked me for a recommendation, and
> because you asked I suggested ReSpec because in this case it's not a bad
> fit -- because among reasons the WebVTT is a small spec and ReSpec and
> handle it well (unlike, say, the HTML spec, which just in terms of its size
> alone makes it not a good fit for ReSpec). And along with that, if you run
> into bugs in ReSpec or have enhancement requests, you're already working
> closely with the maintainer, so you got a pretty good channel for getting
> changes made in it :)
>

Oops! I probably should have said s/asked me/recommended/ then! Sorry for
my poor choice of words. I still think I will follow your recommendation,
even if that means I will have to do some serious search and replace action.

Silvia.