Re: WebVTT spec

Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>, 2013-03-12 11:18 +1100:

> I'll let you know when I'm set up to take this over. I'll work through the
> publishing pipeline with Robin and Mike. I agree that a stage is the first
> step. Mike also asked me to move to using ReSpec,

If you understood me as asking you to move to ReSpec than I think I must
have miscommunicated. I think you asked me for a recommendation, and
because you asked I suggested ReSpec because in this case it's not a bad
fit -- because among reasons the WebVTT is a small spec and ReSpec and
handle it well (unlike, say, the HTML spec, which just in terms of its size
alone makes it not a good fit for ReSpec). And along with that, if you run
into bugs in ReSpec or have enhancement requests, you're already working
closely with the maintainer, so you got a pretty good channel for getting
changes made in it :)

  --Mike

-- 
Michael[tm] Smith http://people.w3.org/mike

Received on Tuesday, 12 March 2013 10:16:55 UTC