- From: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 08:49:43 +0200
- To: "Silvia Pfeiffer" <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-texttracks <public-texttracks@w3.org>, "David Singer" <singer@apple.com>
On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 00:03:38 +0200, Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> wrote: >> Finally, it seems slightly weird that style sheets referenced from the >> WebVTT file itself would use the pseudo-elements, since it would mean >> that >> the selector has to match the <video> of which the track is associated. >> I >> can see some value in being able to use the same style sheet for both >> the >> HTML page and referencing it from the track. OTOH, having to say >> ::cue(blah) >> instead of just blah in an inline style sheet seems quite annoying. > > I definitely want to keep those. I don't think we should use different > CSS inline in a WebVTT file than in a HTML file. That just becomes > annoying when you want to cut and paste and move things around. I'd > much rather live with the ::cue overhead in the WebVTT file. OK. Works for me. For non-HTML environments, should the UA act as if there was an HTML document like the one below for the purpose of selector matching of inline style sheets? <html><head></head><body><video src=""></video></body> -- Simon Pieters Opera Software
Received on Wednesday, 26 September 2012 06:50:19 UTC