- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 23:39:24 +0000 (UTC)
- To: "Goldstein, Glenn" <glenn.goldstein@viacom.com>
- cc: Anna Cavender <annacc@google.com>, Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>, "public-texttracks@w3.org" <public-texttracks@w3.org>, Loretta Guarino Reid <lorettaguarino@google.com>
On Tue, 4 Dec 2012, Goldstein, Glenn wrote: > > actually, it does. without the rollup animation, the steady flow of text > is harder for your eye to follow. This is false. There are several studies, which have been referenced by people other than me on this list and in bugs, that demonstrate this. > we've done some experimentation with smart rollup to pop-on conversion, > but we also need the ability to render this important caption authoring > style on all platforms. rollup should not be thought of just as a funny > artifact of CEA-608 and old-fashioned TV technology. it is a ligitimate > caption authoring style. I disagree. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 4 December 2012 23:39:47 UTC