- From: Loretta Guarino Reid <lorettaguarino@google.com>
- Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 13:52:32 -0700
- To: Glenn Maynard <glenn@zewt.org>
- Cc: Christian Vogler <christian.vogler@gallaudet.edu>, public-texttracks@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAHu5OWbmS4SKn5sNT=yGF_fsxzyw4JdWrSZxjdx3hwcuQCCG4w@mail.gmail.com>
I think the clearest conclusion is that the user needs to be able to choose the styling. Not everyone finds the same style readable. On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 1:49 PM, Glenn Maynard <glenn@zewt.org> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Christian Vogler < > christian.vogler@gallaudet.edu> wrote: > >> Before going off on aesthetics, I think it would be useful to take a >> long hard look at readability. For instance, things like this article: >> http://captionmax.com/blog/2011/02/dvd-subtitles-are-unreadable/ >> > > Neither of the images in this post are using a text outline, so there's > not much of a comparison to draw. Of course white text with no contrast > element at all is unacceptable. > > I also beg to differ with respect to modern captions not using a dark >> background. > > > The only major case I'm aware of is closed captioning, and those aren't > modern. They probably date to hardware which wasn't capable of anything > else. > > While outlines help, they're still not as readable as a >> suitable background. The question that needs answering here, I think, >> is whether suitable outlining of fonts makes dark backgrounds >> superfluous. I'm not sure that this is the case. Anyone have data on >> this? >> > > I disagree that dark backgrounds help at all compared to text outlines. I > only find them ugly, and very distracting. There are lots of examples of > outlined text here: > http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/Use_cases_for_timed_tracks_rendered_over_video_by_the_UA, > and they're easy to read even at thumbnail size. > > -- > Glenn Maynard > > >
Received on Friday, 10 August 2012 20:53:02 UTC