Re: web-platform-tests Governance

Philippe, do you have an update on resolving the double volunteering on the
W3C side?

On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 11:43 PM Mike Pennisi <mike@bocoup.com> wrote:

> Could we have an announcement of the core team and formally begin the
> objection period?
>
> On 10/16/18 9:04 AM, James Graham wrote:
> > On 16/10/2018 10:01, James Graham wrote:
> >> Assuming there are not fundamental objections to the proposed model, we
> >> need to get the ball rolling by choosing an initial core team, which
> >> will consist of about 5 members who are active contributors representing
> >> a wide cross-section of the wpt community. In order to do this we
> >> propose a three step process:
> >>
> >> * Prospective members nominate themselves
> >>
> >> * If possible a mutually agreeable decision is made from the pool of
> >> nominees
> >>
> >> * In the case that no such decision is made we delegate to a neutral
> >> third
> >> party, who is not a nominee, in order to determine the final composition
> >> of the team.
> >
> > There have been some questions about whether the objection period
> > mentioned on the GitHub issue still exists; it does but was
> > unfortunately omitted from the end of this list. So please consider it
> > a four step process, with final step:
> >
> > * The provisional content of the core team is announced on
> > public-test-infra and people have a one month period to object. Any
> > such objections will be handled by the neutral third party (i.e. Marcos).
> >
>
>