Re: web-platform-tests Governance

On 16/10/2018 10:01, James Graham wrote:
> Assuming there are not fundamental objections to the proposed model, we
> need to get the ball rolling by choosing an initial core team, which
> will consist of about 5 members who are active contributors representing
> a wide cross-section of the wpt community. In order to do this we
> propose a three step process:
> * Prospective members nominate themselves
> * If possible a mutually agreeable decision is made from the pool of 
> nominees
> * In the case that no such decision is made we delegate to a neutral third
> party, who is not a nominee, in order to determine the final composition
> of the team.

There have been some questions about whether the objection period 
mentioned on the GitHub issue still exists; it does but was 
unfortunately omitted from the end of this list. So please consider it a 
four step process, with final step:

* The provisional content of the core team is announced on 
public-test-infra and people have a one month period to object. Any such 
objections will be handled by the neutral third party (i.e. Marcos).

Received on Tuesday, 16 October 2018 13:05:09 UTC