- From: James Graham <james@hoppipolla.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 14:04:41 +0100
- To: public-test-infra@w3.org
On 16/10/2018 10:01, James Graham wrote: > Assuming there are not fundamental objections to the proposed model, we > need to get the ball rolling by choosing an initial core team, which > will consist of about 5 members who are active contributors representing > a wide cross-section of the wpt community. In order to do this we > propose a three step process: > > * Prospective members nominate themselves > > * If possible a mutually agreeable decision is made from the pool of > nominees > > * In the case that no such decision is made we delegate to a neutral third > party, who is not a nominee, in order to determine the final composition > of the team. There have been some questions about whether the objection period mentioned on the GitHub issue still exists; it does but was unfortunately omitted from the end of this list. So please consider it a four step process, with final step: * The provisional content of the core team is announced on public-test-infra and people have a one month period to object. Any such objections will be handled by the neutral third party (i.e. Marcos).
Received on Tuesday, 16 October 2018 13:05:09 UTC