- From: Philip Jägenstedt <foolip@google.com>
- Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2017 03:57:48 +0000
- To: James Graham <james@hoppipolla.co.uk>, Bob Holt <bob@bocoup.com>
- Cc: public-test-infra@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAARdPYdP62MMjZH4k4JJRkNDn+-unA1yVAU9v3F1zByffWq8rQ@mail.gmail.com>
I've added the labels now, and https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue%20is%3Aopen%20label%3Ainfra%20-label%3Apriority%3Abacklog%20-label%3Apriority%3Aroadmap%20-label%3Apriority%3Aurgent is a link one might use to do triage of the infra label. On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 8:35 AM Philip Jägenstedt <foolip@google.com> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 8:14 AM James Graham <james@hoppipolla.co.uk> > wrote: > >> On 14/09/17 12:57, Bob Holt wrote: >> > Re: labels, and building on James's suggestions I propose: >> > - priority:urgent >> > - priority:roadmap >> > - priority:backlog >> >> That seems reasonable to me. Agreed that prioritisation is hard without >> some way to ensure that people actually work on the prioritized things, >> but hopefully we have enough regular contributors — including people who >> are paid to work on this — and good enough cooperation to make it happen. >> > > This all sounds good to me, and not doing anything with milestones at this > point simplifies things. I expect that for most issues with > priority:roadmap, they'll be tracked by some external process, like Google > OKRs and similar. > > I'd like to add these labels and go ahead to start with a triage of all > infra issues, as part of the ecosystem infra rotation > <https://docs.google.com/document/d/10och6DoxEe6AhQX7MiQR8AhtjDheKIlf-GpF0impeJQ/edit?usp=sharing> > . > > If there are no concerns in 24 hours, let's do it! >
Received on Saturday, 16 September 2017 03:58:21 UTC