- From: Philip Jägenstedt <foolip@google.com>
- Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 12:35:11 +0000
- To: James Graham <james@hoppipolla.co.uk>, Bob Holt <bob@bocoup.com>
- Cc: public-test-infra@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 14 September 2017 12:35:45 UTC
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 8:14 AM James Graham <james@hoppipolla.co.uk> wrote: > On 14/09/17 12:57, Bob Holt wrote: > > Re: labels, and building on James's suggestions I propose: > > - priority:urgent > > - priority:roadmap > > - priority:backlog > > That seems reasonable to me. Agreed that prioritisation is hard without > some way to ensure that people actually work on the prioritized things, > but hopefully we have enough regular contributors — including people who > are paid to work on this — and good enough cooperation to make it happen. > This all sounds good to me, and not doing anything with milestones at this point simplifies things. I expect that for most issues with priority:roadmap, they'll be tracked by some external process, like Google OKRs and similar. I'd like to add these labels and go ahead to start with a triage of all infra issues, as part of the ecosystem infra rotation <https://docs.google.com/document/d/10och6DoxEe6AhQX7MiQR8AhtjDheKIlf-GpF0impeJQ/edit?usp=sharing> . If there are no concerns in 24 hours, let's do it!
Received on Thursday, 14 September 2017 12:35:45 UTC