- From: James Graham <james@hoppipolla.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 15:02:47 +0100
- To: public-test-infra@w3.org
On 10/05/16 14:58, Shane McCarron wrote: > Okay - sounds like a plan! Do you think we should wait until the tests > are ~complete, or can we start the integration with a handful of proof > of concept tests and then flesh it out in situ? I suggest starting as sooner so that you don't write a whole lot of tests that are unsuitable or need larger changes, for whatever reason. > > On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 8:52 AM, James Graham <james@hoppipolla.co.uk > <mailto:james@hoppipolla.co.uk>> wrote: > > On 10/05/16 14:29, Shane McCarron wrote: > > Okay.... we are making good progress on the work of developing > tests for > the Web Annotation Data Model spec. This is planned to go to CR > in the > coming weeks. The work has not required any new "tools", but > does have > a couple of local python and JS utilities to assist with > generating the > .html files and evaluating the tests. > > So.... what's the process for adding a new top level folder to > wpt? The > shortname is annotation-model, and I have added it in my fork of > wpt [1] > for development purposes. > > > Make a pull request of the branch containing the new folder. Find > someone who understands the spec to review for specwise correctness, > and get someone who understands the test format to review for > correct API usage. > > > > > -- > Shane McCarron > Projects Manager, Spec-Ops
Received on Tuesday, 10 May 2016 14:05:26 UTC