Re: Platform interfaces for Bluetooth testing

On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 3:01 AM, Odin Hørthe Omdal <odinho@opera.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015, at 03:45, Jeffrey Yasskin wrote:
>> Domenic mentioned using WebDriver for some of this, but I'm having
>> trouble finding WebDriver uses in Blink, so that may not be an option
>> for our implementation.
>
> Sorry for not providing any useful feedback on your actual question.
> But I wonder what you mean about this?  Opera is Blink-based and we at
> least use WebDriver for a lot of the tests we run.  So it's at least
> possible.  Our "OperaDriver" is fully based on ChromeDriver, just some
> minor tweaks that's languishing in a Chromium-review somewhere if I'm
> not mistaken.  It might not be an option for other reasons though! #:)

I'm mostly thinking about the infrastructure work to set up automated
runs of a ChromeDriver-based test suite. If we're not already using
it, adding it for a single API isn't a great tradeoff unless there are
technical reasons we have to.

Jeffrey

Received on Friday, 4 September 2015 16:46:04 UTC