- From: Odin Hørthe Omdal <odinho@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:12:40 +0200
- To: Joshua Bell <jsbell@google.com>, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>
- Cc: "Xiaoqian(Cindy) Wu" <xiaoqian@w3.org>, "Zhang, Zhiqiang" <zhiqiang.zhang@intel.com>, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>, "public-test-infra" <public-test-infra@w3.org>, Jonas Sicking <sicking@mozilla.com>
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014, at 19:15, Joshua Bell wrote: > - key_invalid.html - this assumes a particular prioritization of > invalid > input checks, and relates to > https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26492 > > Accounting for those, the "less-than-2" tests show us to be in pretty > good shape across implementations. And on an even higher level, we could get several more test bugs like that because many exceptions are not ordered: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17681 That's a problem we see less with the more procedural style e.g. Fetch is written in. When we did IDB for Presto we were stuck several times on bugs about the exception order. >From the bug you mentioned however, there seems to be some agreement about how to fix this. Since Mozilla is willing to change, and is the only one actually passing those tests right now, it shouldn't be a big problem just changing the tests to what we want to write into the spec (doing the clone first). Trident and Webkit has not responded yet, but they might already do it that way as well. Hence we'll might get three passing and one failure (Gecko) if we're lucky when we change those tests. -- Odin Hørthe Omdal odinho@opera.com
Received on Tuesday, 21 October 2014 09:13:11 UTC