- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 12:07:59 -0400
- To: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
- CC: Masahito Kawamori <kawamori@w3.org>, public-test-infra@w3.org
On 6/25/14 11:32 AM, Philippe Le Hegaret wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 10:31 -0400, Arthur Barstow wrote:
>> I think the lists of "Merged" and "Proposed" (I presume Proposed are new
>> PRs since the last update but I'm not sure) would be more useful if each
>> item in these lists included the name of the spec (f.e.x "Merged#NNN
>> workers: ...").
> How about including the TAGs that are associated with those PRs? They
> include both spec and group info already.
Sure, so perhaps something like:
{Merged,New} <a href="">NNN</a> <spec_name>: " ... title ..."; tags
New <a href="">1007</a> dom: "Add tests for Document.getElementById().";
reviewed, wg-html
Merged 1071 vibration: "Refine Vibration user-interaction tests to avoid
TIMEOUT"; wg-dap
>> Additionally, or perhaps in replacement, how about
>> including the PR's URL?
> I'm ambivalent on this one. This might make the report extra longer
> since one can find those at the top of
> https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/pulls
Perhaps use HTML [have you ever heard of it ;-)] to `hide` the URLs?
-AB
Received on Wednesday, 25 June 2014 16:08:27 UTC