Re: Testing Update for 24 June 2014

On 6/25/14 11:32 AM, Philippe Le Hegaret wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 10:31 -0400, Arthur Barstow wrote:
>> I think the lists of "Merged" and "Proposed" (I presume Proposed are new
>> PRs since the last update but I'm not sure) would be more useful if each
>> item in these lists included the name of the spec (f.e.x "Merged#NNN
>> workers: ...").
> How about including the TAGs that are associated with those PRs? They
> include both spec and group info already.

Sure, so perhaps something like:

{Merged,New} <a href="">NNN</a> <spec_name>: " ... title ..."; tags

New <a href="">1007</a> dom: "Add tests for Document.getElementById()."; 
reviewed, wg-html

Merged 1071 vibration: "Refine Vibration user-interaction tests to avoid 
TIMEOUT"; wg-dap


>>   Additionally, or perhaps in replacement, how about
>> including the PR's URL?
> I'm ambivalent on this one. This might make the report extra longer
> since one can find those at the top of
>   https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/pulls

Perhaps use HTML [have you ever heard of it ;-)] to `hide` the URLs?

-AB