W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-test-infra@w3.org > April to June 2014

Re: Testing Update for 24 June 2014

From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 12:07:59 -0400
Message-ID: <53AAF3DF.8010502@gmail.com>
To: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
CC: Masahito Kawamori <kawamori@w3.org>, public-test-infra@w3.org
On 6/25/14 11:32 AM, Philippe Le Hegaret wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 10:31 -0400, Arthur Barstow wrote:
>> I think the lists of "Merged" and "Proposed" (I presume Proposed are new
>> PRs since the last update but I'm not sure) would be more useful if each
>> item in these lists included the name of the spec (f.e.x "Merged#NNN
>> workers: ...").
> How about including the TAGs that are associated with those PRs? They
> include both spec and group info already.

Sure, so perhaps something like:

{Merged,New} <a href="">NNN</a> <spec_name>: " ... title ..."; tags

New <a href="">1007</a> dom: "Add tests for Document.getElementById()."; 
reviewed, wg-html

Merged 1071 vibration: "Refine Vibration user-interaction tests to avoid 
TIMEOUT"; wg-dap

>>   Additionally, or perhaps in replacement, how about
>> including the PR's URL?
> I'm ambivalent on this one. This might make the report extra longer
> since one can find those at the top of
>   https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/pulls

Perhaps use HTML [have you ever heard of it ;-)] to `hide` the URLs?

Received on Wednesday, 25 June 2014 16:08:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:34:10 UTC