- From: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 11:32:30 -0400
- To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>
- Cc: Masahito Kawamori <kawamori@w3.org>, public-test-infra@w3.org
On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 10:31 -0400, Arthur Barstow wrote: > I think the lists of "Merged" and "Proposed" (I presume Proposed are new > PRs since the last update but I'm not sure) would be more useful if each > item in these lists included the name of the spec (f.e.x "Merged#NNN > workers: ..."). How about including the TAGs that are associated with those PRs? They include both spec and group info already. > Additionally, or perhaps in replacement, how about > including the PR's URL? I'm ambivalent on this one. This might make the report extra longer since one can find those at the top of https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/pulls Philippe
Received on Wednesday, 25 June 2014 15:32:37 UTC