Re: Testing Update for 24 June 2014

On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 10:31 -0400, Arthur Barstow wrote:
> I think the lists of "Merged" and "Proposed" (I presume Proposed are new 
> PRs since the last update but I'm not sure) would be more useful if each 
> item in these lists included the name of the spec (f.e.x "Merged#NNN 
> workers: ...").

How about including the TAGs that are associated with those PRs? They
include both spec and group info already.

>  Additionally, or perhaps in replacement, how about 
> including the PR's URL?

I'm ambivalent on this one. This might make the report extra longer
since one can find those at the top of
 https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/pulls

Philippe

Received on Wednesday, 25 June 2014 15:32:37 UTC