- From: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 13:53:47 +0200
- To: Erika Doyle Navara <Erika.Doyle@microsoft.com>, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>, public-test-infra <public-test-infra@w3.org>
Hi Erika, On 30/04/2014 21:17 , Erika Doyle Navara wrote: > On Monday, April 28, 2014, Philippe Le Hegaret wrote: >> I was wondering in the /tools directory the other day and noticed >> we have some old unused stuff there. I'd like to clean this up and >> remove those unused files. If this goes through, it would remove >> the directories tools/json, tools/html, tools/coverage, a few >> phantomjs script in tools/scripts, and tools/README. > > Regarding the tools/coverage directory, I'm curious to understand why > the "Test Suite Coverage Analysis" effort was abandoned, and also > more about the current thinking on tracking coverage per spec. The coverage work was initially conducted in order to assess how much funding the testing effort would need to reach various coverage levels. Since the whole "get funding" part didn't work out, no one has been updating the coverage stuff. If anyone wishes to take over the code and do something with it that maintains more up to date coverage information (keeping in mind that of course it is always very heuristic) it is certainly welcome! -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
Received on Monday, 12 May 2014 11:53:56 UTC