- From: James Graham <james@hoppipolla.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 15:27:19 +0000
- To: "public-test-infra@w3.org" <public-test-infra@w3.org>
- CC: Art.Barstow@nokia.com
On 19/12/13 15:16, Ms2ger wrote: > [ Bcc: public-webapps, public-webapps-testsuite ] > > Hi Art, > > On 12/19/2013 03:54 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote: >> I think it would be helpful if WebApps had a common way to "manage" test >> case bugs, in particular: >> >> 1. A common way to report a test bug >> >> 2. An easy way to determine if a specific test suite has any open bugs. >> (For example, if someone goes to the websockets test suite on WPT, it >> should be easy to determine if any of the test cases have open bugs.) > > >> Comments, proposals, etc. are welcome. > > I strongly believe we should decide on a single way of managing bugs for > all test suites in w-p-t (so moving the discussion to > public-test-infra). It doesn't really matter to me whether that's done > through github or bugzilla. Two things to consider, though: > > * Some issues might span multiple test suites. > * It seems possible that we'd want to cross-reference test suite issues > and specification issues. > * Cross-referencing commits/PRs with issues might also be useful. It pains me to say this, but if we want any kind of bug reports from non-core contributers, GitHub issues are probably the way to go. The extreme suckiness of their issue tracker is outweighed by the fact that reporting bugs in bugzilla is super-painful; you have to know it exists, create a user account, figure out what the right component is and then finally file the actual issue. By contrast, with GH you more or less just click "New Issue".
Received on Thursday, 19 December 2013 15:27:52 UTC