- From: Tobie Langel <tobie@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 14:59:34 +0200
- To: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Cc: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>, public-test-infra@w3.org
On Wednesday, October 23, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote: > Le mercredi 23 octobre 2013 à 14:38 +0200, Tobie Langel a écrit : > > My understanding of what Robin describes is a partial, instrumented > > implementation that could be used for testing. > > > > If so, it could qualify as an interoperable implementation, no? > I'm not I understand this; let me try to explain what I mean: when a new > phone protocol goes out, implementors not only tests their > implementations against a reference implementation, they also test that > a real phone A can indeed call a real phone B and vice versa. > > I'm saying the same type of interop testing needs to be done for WebRTC. I guess a plug-fest like event makes sense for CR exit. I'm very much curious about what CI strategy browser vendors will set up for WebRTC. Relying on third party browsers for that seems painful. --tobie
Received on Wednesday, 23 October 2013 12:58:09 UTC