W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-test-infra@w3.org > October to December 2013

Re: Testing for WebRTC

From: Tobie Langel <tobie@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 14:38:16 +0200
To: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
Cc: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>, public-test-infra@w3.org
Message-ID: <28770C2B2FC547E69064E578F139D393@w3.org>
On Wednesday, October 23, 2013 at 2:09 PM, Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote:
> Le mercredi 23 octobre 2013 à 14:04 +0200, Robin Berjon a écrit :
> > I would be interested, but depending on where/when it is I might not be  
> > able to make it.
> Noted; I guess the where and when will be determined once we know the
> who :) At this time, the limited number of people that have shown
> interest are all Europe based FWIW.
> > That said, to what degree do you actually *need* this to run with  
> > multiple browsers? Would it not be better to run with a browser on one  
> > side and something else pretending to be a browser that's actually testing?
> While this might be practical for some of the testing contexts (e.g
> continuous integration), I think the WebRTC Working Group should include
> in its CR exit criteria actual interop across actual browsers, which we
> should prove with testing across different browsers.

My understanding of what Robin describes is a partial, instrumented implementation that could be used for testing.

If so, it could qualify as an interoperable implementation, no?

Received on Wednesday, 23 October 2013 12:36:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:34:10 UTC