On Friday, October 11, 2013 at 5:05 PM, James Graham wrote: > I don't really know how you would get a certificate for such a hostname > though. A self-signed cert. isn't good enough since browsers will > complain about it. I assume no CA will actually sign such a cert. > (additionally, the name is theoretically resolvable; someone could pay > for the .test tld. Hopefully that's not a big risk, but it's hard to know). Why don't we just purchase a domain name and use it only for that? --tobieReceived on Friday, 11 October 2013 15:14:50 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:34:10 UTC