- From: Tobie Langel <tobie@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 03:26:17 +0200
- To: Tobie Langel <tobie@w3.org>
- Cc: Rebecca Hauck <rhauck@adobe.com>, "Zhang, Zhiqiang" <zhiqiang.zhang@intel.com>, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>, "public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org" <public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org>, "public-testtwf-planning@w3.org" <public-testtwf-planning@w3.org>, "public-test-infra@w3.org" <public-test-infra@w3.org>
On Sep 26, 2013, at 3:20, Tobie Langel <tobie@w3.org> wrote: > On Sep 26, 2013, at 2:44, Rebecca Hauck <rhauck@adobe.com> wrote: > >> Of course, there is the issue of test metadata that we require and >> leverage in the CSSWG that is not such a hard requirement from other WGs. > > Is this a CSS WG-specific requirement or a reftest specific one? > > If these are CSS WG requirements, and at the risk of sounding like a broken record, it would be really useful to have them written down somewhere and backed-up by concrete use cases. Without input from the CSS WG on those issues, it's going to be increasingly difficult to handle the WG's requirements within the common infrastructure that is getting built, e.g.: the test server James Graham is building. > > -- Sorry folks, that's an important issue but is both off topic and in the wrong set of mailing lists. Apologies, --tobie
Received on Thursday, 26 September 2013 01:26:27 UTC