- From: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2013 11:51:19 +0200
- To: James Graham <james@hoppipolla.co.uk>
- CC: public-test-infra@w3.org
On 07/08/2013 17:46 , James Graham wrote: > On 2013-08-07 08:36, Robin Berjon wrote: >> Yeah, but the value of using a DSL (so long as it's a really simple >> format) is that we don't at all have to worry about people checking in >> code. Presumably once we have this new server we will be phasing out >> PHP, and the whole test tree will be served "dumbly". This means that >> we can simply publish every single PR on the web without review, etc. >> It's much safer. > > Well except that presumably foo() is a custom function defined > somewhere, and people will need to add their own custom things. Nope, "foo()" is just body text (JS in this case). I'm not convinced that people will need to add much of their own custom things that wouldn't be supported in the core. Can you think of an example? -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
Received on Thursday, 8 August 2013 09:53:15 UTC