Re: [docs] Citing original sources of test documentation

Thanks for bringing that up.

License-wise, we're covered by the member agreement. Seems nonetheless polite to acknowledge the sources.

Maybe we could have a site-wide credits page which lists such contributions in broad terms (e.g. large parts of the documentation on Reftests was lifted of the wikis of the CSS working group, etc.)

--tobie

On Friday, July 26, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Rebecca Hauck wrote: 
> Hey Tobie & all,
> 
> As I/we are migrating & updating documentation from many sources, should we follow a process to credit or cite those sources? 
> 
> A few options:
> Link to archived and clearly deprecated previous version (assuming everything stays alive somewhere)
> Names of the original authors
> Generic citation:  "Sourced and updated from w3.org (http://w3.org) or http://wiki.csswg.org/test"
> No citation
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> -Rebecca
>