W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-test-infra@w3.org > January to March 2013

Re: Review of tests upstreamed by implementors

From: Rebecca Hauck <rhauck@adobe.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 14:29:52 -0700
To: James Graham <jgraham@opera.com>, Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
CC: Tobie Langel <tobie@w3.org>, public-test-infra <public-test-infra@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CD6F7351.C8D6%rhauck@adobe.com>

>It is my opinion that we should be putting considerably more effort into
>working with all implementors to ensure that they are actually running
>tests that we are collecting.

I doubt anyone disagrees with this. And you're probably right about
implementors not running all or many of the W3C tests. The quandary is
that implementors seem to want to only take tests (not authored by them)
that are blessed by the W3C and the W3C wants implementors to bless the
tests by running them. Perhaps part of "working with implementors" is 1)
resetting their expectations on the state of W3C tests and 2) persuading
them to regularly accept and run all tests in whatever state with the
understanding that if something goes wrong, the onus is on the implementor
to (re)review the test and resolve the inconsistency wherever it may lie.

I'm personally thrilled that we're having this conversation. Even though
the solution that emerges from this may not be immediately obvious, this
thread gets to the very essence of What W3C Tests are For.


p.s. Robin, you are just downright poetic sometimes
Received on Wednesday, 20 March 2013 21:29:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:34:08 UTC