- From: Tobie Langel <tobie@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 13:21:13 +0200
- To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Cc: Hallvord Reiar Michaelsen Steen <hallvord@opera.com>, public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org, public-test-infra <public-test-infra@w3.org>
Long term, WebDriver should help up solve this problem. Short term, we need a way to identify such tests and avoid running them in an automated fashion. --tobie On Thursday, May 23, 2013 at 1:14 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote: > [ + public-test-infra ] > > Hi Hallvord, > > Good question. I recall this being discussed a bit before but I don't > believe there was consensus on what to do. > > I am indifferent as to what WebApps does, however, it might be useful to > see what other groups are doing in case we want to leverage prior work > (or learn about things to avoid). > > All? > > -AB > > On 5/23/13 6:27 AM, ext Hallvord Reiar Michaelsen Steen wrote: > > Hi, > > I'd like to add some HTTP Auth-related tests that require manual authentication to the XHR tests. Now, browser vendors have frameworks for automating such tests and some things are even standardised but as far as I know there is no common standard for how to add interactive tests to the W3C test suites. Should I make a folder named "interactive" and put them there, list them in a special manifest, or just ignore the problem that they might be run and fail in automated test runs? >
Received on Thursday, 23 May 2013 11:21:24 UTC