Re: Testing Web IDL Usage

On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 2:41 AM, Robin Berjon <> wrote:

> On 07/12/2012 17:32 , Arthur Barstow wrote:
>> Note that idlharness.js is not complete yet but does cover several parts
>> of the specification. If you have any questions/comments/etc. about
>> idlharness or your document uses a feature not yet supported by
>> idlharness, please use the following list:
>> (archive [4])
> Note that I've been porting idlharness to use WebIDL2.js, which supports
> WebIDL as it is today (or at least, it is believed to).
> I've only performed the more cursory part of the work so far, but it
> already works at least for the simpler stuff.
> If there are specific WebIDL features that you've wanted to test but
> weren't able to due to the limitations in the WebIDL parser that idlharness
> used previously, please let me know and I'll prioritise them for inclusion
> in the new branch.

have you added the features I requested in ?

Received on Tuesday, 18 December 2012 18:01:27 UTC