On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 2:41 AM, Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org> wrote: > On 07/12/2012 17:32 , Arthur Barstow wrote: > >> Note that idlharness.js is not complete yet but does cover several parts >> of the specification. If you have any questions/comments/etc. about >> idlharness or your document uses a feature not yet supported by >> idlharness, please use the following list: >> >> public-test-infra@w3.org (archive [4]) >> > > Note that I've been porting idlharness to use WebIDL2.js, which supports > WebIDL as it is today (or at least, it is believed to). > > I've only performed the more cursory part of the work so far, but it > already works at least for the simpler stuff. > > If there are specific WebIDL features that you've wanted to test but > weren't able to due to the limitations in the WebIDL parser that idlharness > used previously, please let me know and I'll prioritise them for inclusion > in the new branch. have you added the features I requested in https://github.com/darobin/webidl.js/pull/16 ?Received on Tuesday, 18 December 2012 18:01:27 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:34:08 UTC