- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 07:20:13 -0400
- To: ext Tobie Langel <tobie@fb.com>
- CC: Kris Krueger <krisk@microsoft.com>, Odin Hørthe Omdal <odinho@opera.com>, "public-test-infra@w3.org" <public-test-infra@w3.org>
On 9/19/12 12:33 PM, ext Tobie Langel wrote: > On 9/19/12 6:27 PM, "Kris Krueger" <krisk@microsoft.com> wrote: > >> I believe it's a lot of extra work without a lot of benefit. > I guess that depends whether we're planning to rely on the developer > community to significantly help with test authoring... or not. Do we have any real cases where someone refused to contribute tests because of a hg versus git barrier? If yes, please send me the links. Coremob presumably has a bunch of non-W3C people (let's consider them part of the "developer community" above) and its charter includes "test suites" as a primary deliverable. What's the contribution success from that CG? I ask because I'm wondering what we should consider as realistic expectations for test contributions from this "community", especially vis-a-vis the use of "rely" above. -Thanks, Art
Received on Friday, 21 September 2012 11:21:11 UTC