Re: W3C Testing How To slides

On Wed, 19 Sep 2012, Rebecca Hauck wrote:

> BTW, I nominated this topic as a session idea on the Plenary day at TPAC
> next month.

I see that's listed as a session for someone else to organise/lead. If no 
one else wants I am quite happy to run such a session.

> On 9/19/12 9:33 AM, "Tobie Langel" <> wrote:
>> On 9/19/12 6:27 PM, "Kris Krueger" <> wrote:
>>> I believe it's a lot of extra work without a lot of benefit.
>> I guess that depends whether we're planning to rely on the developer
>> community to significantly help with test authoring... or not.

Indeed this is a factor; github gets lots of exposure so we are much more 
likely to get test contributions from authors encountering bugs in their 
day-to-day work if we have a presence there. It is pretty annoying to get 
to the stage of making a pull request only to be told "do some midly 
compelex magic to format the patch for hg, then apply it to a different 
repository". Indeed I would expect most people to give up at that point.

FWIW I strongly doubt that authors will ever be providing the majority of 
testsby number or anything. But their tests are valuable because they come 
from actual problems they have experienced. So I really don't think it is 
wise to operate in our own ghetto.

Received on Wednesday, 19 September 2012 17:18:01 UTC