- From: Michael[tm] Smith <mike@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 10:14:47 +0900
- To: Kris Krueger <krisk@microsoft.com>
- Cc: James Graham <jgraham@opera.com>, Tobie Langel <tobie@fb.com>, "public-test-infra@w3.org" <public-test-infra@w3.org>
Kris Krueger <krisk@microsoft.com>, 2012-08-08 17:36 +0000: > I'm not opposed in general to this, though I do think the license issue is a blocker and will need to be addressed. There is no license issue that I'm aware of. The test suites are all fully free software with a permissive license: http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/2008/04-testsuite-copyright There's nothing in the license which says anything at all about where the test suites are licensed -- in particular nothing about test suites needing to be hosted at the W3C, nor even that there needs to be a single canonical place where test suites need to hosted. The only thing that's required is for contributors to agree to make their contributions available under that license, so that we can have a record of agreement from all the contributors in order to document that all the test cases are in fact free software (so that others can then use the test suites freely, and redistribute them freely, and modify them, and redistribute their modifications, etc.). We can still ensure that all contributors complete the agreement, regardless of where the test suites are hosted -- as James noted in an earlier message on this thread: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-test-infra/2012JulSep/0030.html "...other projects use github that require a CLA before contributing (e.g. Django), so it seems that in practice one can successfully use the github model and require license agreements to be filled in before contributions are accepted." --Mike -- Michael[tm] Smith http://people.w3.org/mike
Received on Thursday, 9 August 2012 01:14:52 UTC