Re: Getting started on the Documentation Practices task force

The CSS WG has a bunch of documentation about our test review process at:
http://wiki.csswg.org/test/css2.1/review

Note that this was written before we had our test suite management system online at:
http://test.csswg.org/shepherd

Test assertions as part of a spec here:
http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css3-regions#spec-and-test-metadata

Peter

On Jan 31, 2012, at 3:14 PM, Bryan Sullivan wrote:

> Oops, gotta love Gmail.
> 
> Anyway I was going to continue, that if anyone has input on those
> objectives please chime in on this list, and help me develop the set
> of info that will help us determine consensus etc. I know there is
> some useful prior work and current practices that will also be
> referenced, and some analysis done on the pros/cons of them might be
> useful. But first spreading the word about how groups go about
> developing test assertions and test documentation/assets, and what
> methods might be useful to consider for groups who don't have a
> specific method for these, is the first step.
> 
> In addition to the page noted below, some initial data is provided at
> http://www.w3.org/wiki/Testing/Assertions. This is a rough first pass
> and incomplete, purely in the data collection phase of this.
> 
> Thanks,
> Bryan Sullivan
> 
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Bryan Sullivan <blsaws@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> To get the ball rolling on the "Documentation Practices" task force of
>> the Web Testing Interest Group, that I agreed to lead during TPAC, I
>> have created a set of wiki pages where the work in progress of the TF
>> can be collected. As noted on the wiki page
>> (http://www.w3.org/wiki/Testing/Documentation_Practices), the goal of
>> this task force is to:
>> * determine the current practices for
>>        developing test assertions as part of W3C specs
>>        processes to review and approve tests
>>    broadening consensus on the above
>>    promoting adoption of the consensus approach
>> 
>> --
>> Thanks,
>> Bryan Sullivan
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Thanks,
> Bryan Sullivan
>

Received on Wednesday, 1 February 2012 00:04:16 UTC