- From: Fritz, Kay, VF-DE <Kay.Fritz@vodafone.com>
- Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2011 16:17:17 +0200
- To: "Philippe Le Hegaret" <plh@w3.org>, "public-test-infra" <public-test-infra@w3.org>
Hello Philippe, Personally I would put CSS right behind HTML, and after that Javascript and move SVG more towards the end of the list. Does it make sense to put Geolocation into html or WebApps? Kind regards Kay -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: public-test-infra-request@w3.org [mailto:public-test-infra-request@w3.org] Im Auftrag von Philippe Le Hegaret Gesendet: Montag, 8. August 2011 14:55 An: public-test-infra Betreff: For Today: Test suite framework and WGs I'm interested in feedback on agenda+ Number of tests in a test suite http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-test-infra/2011JulSep/0009.html agenda+ Ordering of WGs for integration in the test suite framework In the past, I said that we should start with the Web Performance Working Group (and we did), then do the HTML Working Group, and then we'll keep adding after that. I can imagine something like: WebPerf, HTML, WebApps, WAI PF (ARIA), Geolocation, Web Fonts, SVG, I18n, Device API, Web Events, CSS, Web Notification, Audio, WebRTC CSS is low on the list but could be raised if the WG is interested. Is there a different order that people would like to see? Philippe
Received on Monday, 8 August 2011 14:18:12 UTC