- From: Phil Barker <phil.barker@pjjk.co.uk>
- Date: Sun, 5 May 2019 17:52:04 +0100
- To: public-talent-signal@w3.org
- Message-ID: <edd4ea26-1d69-7160-bcd7-189372f8d3c1@pjjk.co.uk>
Thank you both. For what it is worth, the expected type of ISO 8601 Date does allow a range of dates (interval), but I guess we don't need to mention that. Phil On 03/05/2019 19:28, Joseph D. Marsh wrote: > > Agreed. > > Thanks, > > - Joseph > > *From:*Merrilea Mayo <merrileamayo@gmail.com> > *Sent:* Friday, May 3, 2019 2:23 PM > *To:* public-talent-signal@w3.org > *Subject:* Re: [TalentSignal] proposal for Job Start Date > > I've never seen it? Not common. > > Merrilea > > On 5/3/2019 1:06 PM, Phil Barker wrote: > > Just thinking some more about this: Is there any case for allowing > a range of dates? Are there examples of job being advertised to > start between "now and three weeks time" or "after 1 June but > before 15 June"? > > Phil > > On 02/05/2019 16:02, Phil Barker wrote: > > Hello all, the second relatively simple issue that we > prioritized, is that currently schema.org/JobPosting has no > way to specify the expected start date for the job being > advertised. > > A simple way to fix this > <https://www.w3.org/community/talent-signal/wiki/Provide_start_date_for_job> > is a new property of JobPosting: > > *jobStartDate* > > *Definition: *The date on which a successful applicant for > this job would be expected to start work. Text values such > as "Immediately" or "As soon as possible" may be used when > a specific date is not appropriate. > > *Expected type:* ISO 8601 Date <https://schema.org/Date> > or Text <https://schema.org/Text> > > Please let me know if you wish to improve on this or have an > alternative suggestion. In particular, is a text value to > indicate an immediate start sufficient, or should this be > handled more explicitly, for example as a separate property? > > On that question, my own view (as exemplified in the proposal) > is that, while an explicit indicator for immediate start may > be useful for internal systems, a text value is adequate for > advertising this on the web. If experience and demand show > that this approach is not adequate, we would have evidence to > provide to schema.org for a separate, explicit property. > > Regards, Phil. > > -- > > Phil Barker <http://people.pjjk.net/phil>. > http://people.pjjk.net/phil <http://people.pjjk.net/phil> > CETIS LLP <https://www.cetis.org.uk>: a cooperative > consultancy for innovation in education technology. > PJJK Limited <https://www.pjjk.co.uk>: technology to enhance > learning; information systems for education. > > CETIS is a co-operative limited liability partnership, > registered in England number OC399090 > PJJK Limited is registered in Scotland as a private limited > company, number SC569282. > > -- > > Phil Barker <http://people.pjjk.net/phil>. > http://people.pjjk.net/phil <http://people.pjjk.net/phil> > CETIS LLP <https://www.cetis.org.uk>: a cooperative consultancy > for innovation in education technology. > PJJK Limited <https://www.pjjk.co.uk>: technology to enhance > learning; information systems for education. > > CETIS is a co-operative limited liability partnership, registered > in England number OC399090 > PJJK Limited is registered in Scotland as a private limited > company, number SC569282. > > -- > > Merrilea J. Mayo, Ph.D. > Mayo Enterprises, LLC > 12101 Sheets Farm Rd. > North Potomac, MD 20878 > > merrileamayo@gmail.com <mailto:merrileamayo@gmail.com> > https://merrileamayo.com/ <%20> > 240-304-0439 (cell) > 301-977-2599 (landline) > -- Phil Barker <http://people.pjjk.net/phil>. http://people.pjjk.net/phil CETIS LLP <https://www.cetis.org.uk>: a cooperative consultancy for innovation in education technology. PJJK Limited <https://www.pjjk.co.uk>: technology to enhance learning; information systems for education. CETIS is a co-operative limited liability partnership, registered in England number OC399090 PJJK Limited is registered in Scotland as a private limited company, number SC569282.
Received on Sunday, 5 May 2019 16:52:28 UTC