- From: Simon Grant <asimong@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 15:38:05 +0100
- To: Alex Jackl <alex@bardicsystems.com>
- Cc: "Tyszko, Jason" <jtyszko@uschamber.com>, Phil Barker <phil.barker@pjjk.co.uk>, "public-talent-signal@w3.org" <public-talent-signal@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CALV740TMMfvhqPYnvzaXVM14Dm5PZ4=PKzUUzBqgn5ZoFE2roQ@mail.gmail.com>
It's very understandable that people elide certain words if there is no confusion in their home context. In this case, though, I think it would be really helpful to distinguish three things which could loosely be called "competency", and which I think different people are referring to at different times. 1. A natural "competency": a property of an agent, as in the question "do you have this competency" meaning "are you competent" rather than "are you qualified/certificated" 2. A "competency definition" (or "competency description"): a form of words describing a competency without reference to the person that may or may not have it. 3. A "certificate of competency" or "competency certificate": something like a credential (I have no opinion about whether it is a credential or not) that means that some organisation attests that a person has a competency. You could also have an abstract "competency certificate description" but I think that is less helpful. To my reading, Alex so far has been closest to keeping these distinctions clear. Does that help? Simon On Tue, 20 Aug 2019 at 14:54, Alex Jackl <alex@bardicsystems.com> wrote: > Jason, > > You point to an interesting thing. I think I understand exactly what you > are saying. You are saying: > "a university may publish that a particular person has achieved these ten > competencies but did not get an Associate's degree." > > I would *strongly assert (I am not saying this is true but I htink it > should be) *that a super formal credential like an associate's degree IS > not structurally different than a "university publishing the achievement of > having mastered these ten competencies" . It is not a difference in TYPE, > it is a difference in scale and formality. > > A Credential could be a badge that I issued through Credly that you > attended four hours of *Alex Jackl's Amazing Data Emporium*, or it could > be a PhD in Information System Design from MIT. > > Both are credentials - and what makes it a credential/achievement > assertion rather than a competency is the assertion from an organization > that XYZ knowledge, skill, aptitude or experience has been validated in > some way. > > A competency/achievement description is the description of the XYZ > knowledge, skill, aptitude or experience that is being assesses or > asserted. > > I believe this level of simplicity and clarity in language will serve us > well as we try to align all these standards and methods of describing > these issues > > -- from Simon Grant +44 7710031657 (I'm "asimong" with many services)
Attachments
- image/png attachment: image001.png
- image/jpeg attachment: image002.jpg
- image/jpeg attachment: image003.jpg
Received on Tuesday, 20 August 2019 14:38:47 UTC