- From: Phil Barker <phil.barker@pjjk.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 09:58:03 +0100
- To: Stuart Sutton <stuartasutton@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-talent-signal@w3.org
- Message-ID: <cb08a44b-f8ae-ba88-40fb-63c56fbc04b1@pjjk.co.uk>
Yes, it was the extension of jobTitle that caught my eye too. I think there are enough use cases to justify it in JobPosting: at least in the UK public sector it is quite common for job titles to carry some formal meaning. If you were a US academic moving to the UK and saw a University advertising "Lecturer"/"Reader"/"Research Fellow" posts you would probably benefit from a link defining them. The adoption of DefinedTerm & CategoryCode mirrors what we saw in the Educational Occupational Credentials group, and I too hope it is something that this group finds useful. Phil On 17/04/2019 16:05, Stuart Sutton wrote: > Phil, it is an interesting discussion with a resulting pull request > (Richard Wallis) that makes good sense to me. Basic thrust , I think, > is that 'occupationCategory' and 'jobTitle' (and I'd add 'industry') > properties need their range(s) extended to include > CategoryCode/DefinedTerm to handle codes/terms from different > classification schemes as opposed to creating new properties for each > of those various classification schemes. I would hope that this use of > DefinedTerm/CategoryCode would be a conclusion reached naturally in > the course of discussion by the TalentSignal community (but looks like > it is actually going to happen anyway). > > The really interesting part is the extension of 'jobTitle' to include > in its range 'DefinedTerm` to capture "formal" job titles defined in > controlled lists and classifications as distinct from the informal > (colloquial) job titles (usually?) found in a job posting. This would > clearly be a useful case where a fuller job description was desired > that included a colloquial/local job title as well as the formal > title. If we were discussing "job descriptions" as opposed to > "job postings" (different artifacts), I'd be really enthusiastic about > this addition to the range of 'jobTitle'. > > > > On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 7:27 AM Phil Barker <phil.barker@pjjk.co.uk > <mailto:phil.barker@pjjk.co.uk>> wrote: > > Hello all, there is a discussion on going on the schema.org > <http://schema.org> github issue tracker about classificiation of > occupational categories. > > https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/2192 > > Any comments? > > Phil > > -- > > Phil Barker <https://people.pjjk.net/phil>. > http://people.pjjk.net/phil > PJJK Limited <https://www.pjjk.co.uk/>: technology to enhance > learning; information systems for education. > CETIS LLP <https://www.cetis.org.uk/>: a cooperative consultancy > for innovation in education technology. > > PJJK Limited is registered in Scotland as a private limited > company, number SC569282. > CETIS is a co-operative limited liability partnership, registered > in England number OC399090 > -- Phil Barker <https://people.pjjk.net/phil>. http://people.pjjk.net/phil PJJK Limited <https://www.pjjk.co.uk/>: technology to enhance learning; information systems for education. CETIS LLP <https://www.cetis.org.uk/>: a cooperative consultancy for innovation in education technology. PJJK Limited is registered in Scotland as a private limited company, number SC569282. CETIS is a co-operative limited liability partnership, registered in England number OC399090
Received on Thursday, 18 April 2019 08:58:27 UTC