- From: Stuart Sutton <stuartasutton@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 08:50:13 -0700
- To: Fritz Ray <fritley@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-talent-signal@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CACetQ6F+0McV6BnYJPErpKSp=SEeygF3Z0upXhRUc0YY_8w1tg@mail.gmail.com>
Fritz, can you be a bit more specific about bullet 2? I don't understand the scenario or your suggested solution. On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 8:45 AM Fritz Ray <fritley@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > Scoping questions -- let me know if you've already discussed them, as I > just joined the group and haven't been very involved in the JDX: > > - Uber, Taskrabbit, classified ads, and other areas of work have > popped up that are "single-task jobs" -- Gigs. Gigs appear to be getting > more popular over time and have some differences: They also tend to be more > like a service with a fixed payment. Should we attempt to scope those into > this work, either as an object or just as a usage profile? > - Similarly, Positions in a company, nonprofit, club, project, or > other work-oriented roles also exist that represent working in an > organization distinct from compensation.. Pushing down some of the fields > of JobPosting (responsibilities, skills, title, relevant occupation, etc) > into a JobPosition base class will yield benefits through reuse here, and > could help define roles or positions (filled or unfilled) in Organizations > that then serve as a base for generating JobPosting objects. > > Those are the itches I've had when I've used JobPosting and other objects > to represent in schema.org how work is done. > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 7:45 AM Merrilea Mayo <merrileamayo@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Just got off a videoconference with some folks at ESCO, the European >> skills & occupation taxonomy effort. I think bullet number 1 is going to >> be important to address, and the other bullet seems like an obvious nee as >> well. I'm in agreement. >> On 4/17/2019 10:16 AM, Stuart Sutton wrote: >> >> Phil, I think the two immediate actions to try and hit the next release >> are a good place to start. >> >> On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 8:36 AM Phil Barker <phil.barker@pjjk.co.uk> >> wrote: >> >>> Hello all, >>> >>> I have set up a wiki for the Talent Signal community group >>> <https://www.w3.org/community/talent-signal/wiki/Main_Page>. You should >>> all have edit access when logged in to your W3C account. >>> >>> I have copied to the wiki most of the content from the Google doc on possible >>> requirements for job descriptions >>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1SfB2d-CkxrbfOJJPcBjb_etGJJ0_Rk9ELpqsQx5QwKA/edit#heading=h.52xm8fh2jw5g> >>> that I circulated last month. That content is now here: >>> https://www.w3.org/community/talent-signal/wiki/Issues,_use_cases_and_requirements >>> >>> I suggest that we pick a few of the issues on that page and try to >>> address them in time for the next release of schema.org (due May 1). We >>> should chose some which seem relatively significant but easy. I think these >>> are good candidates: >>> >>> - occupationalCategory definition requires O*Net-SOC taxonomy, which >>> is too prescriptive & US-centric. See also issue 2192 and PR 2207 which >>> adds CategoryCode to range of occupationalCategory. >>> - Should be able to provide start date for job (see issue 1829 point >>> 10) >>> >>> (see wiki for relevant links) >>> >>> *Please indicate *(by reply to this email) whether you think these are >>> a reasonable choice and whether you would add any others. After Easter we >>> can look at suggested changes to propose to schema.org. >>> >>> Also please suggest any changes to the wiki by way of new use cases, >>> refinements to the existing text, clarifications etc. either by email if >>> there needs to be discussion or by fixing what is on the wiki if there is a >>> clear error. >>> >>> Best regards, Phil >>> -- >>> >>> Phil Barker <http://people.pjjk.net/phil>. http://people.pjjk.net/phil >>> CETIS LLP <https://www.cetis.org.uk>: a cooperative consultancy for >>> innovation in education technology. >>> PJJK Limited <https://www.pjjk.co.uk>: technology to enhance learning; >>> information systems for education. >>> >>> CETIS is a co-operative limited liability partnership, registered in >>> England number OC399090 >>> PJJK Limited is registered in Scotland as a private limited company, >>> number SC569282. >>> >> -- >> >> Merrilea J. Mayo, Ph.D. >> Mayo Enterprises, LLC >> 12101 Sheets Farm Rd. >> North Potomac, MD 20878 >> >> merrileamayo@gmail..com <merrileamayo@gmail.com> >> https://merrileamayo.com/ >> 240-304-0439 (cell) >> 301-977-2599 (landline) >> >
Received on Wednesday, 17 April 2019 15:50:49 UTC