- From: Wayne Carr <wayne.carr@linux.intel.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 12:48:53 -0700
- To: "public-sysapps@w3.org" <public-sysapps@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <551462A5.7000205@linux.intel.com>
There are 6 specs that reached First Public Working Draft (so formally on the REC track and eligible for relicensing to move to a CG). The CfC that ends at the end of the day Friday is for: Contacts, Messaging, Telephony. Those seemed obvious and we use those, so we asked only for those. There are 3 ofter specs that have reached FPWD (so eligible to ask for relicensing to move to a Community Group). I don't want to start another CfC on stopping work on specs this week to avoid confusion in the CfC that's about to end Friday. The CfC for these I think would need to be worded differently because some look like they could be in scope for the WebApps WG and service workers. App URI <http://www.w3.org/2012/sysapps/app-uri/> Scheduler API <http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-task-scheduler-20141202/> TCP UDP Sockets <http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-tcp-udp-sockets-20141202/> Scheduler API looks like it would fit in Web Apps with Service Workers. A CfC we could do next week could be worded like this (not doing the CfC now - but would someone want different wording?): NOT A CFC NOW - JUST WHAT THE WORDING COULD BE - WOULD DO THIS CFC NEXT WEEK The purpose of this informal CfC is to determine consensus on the following proposition: The members of the SysApps WG support stopping SysApps WG work on the following specs: App URI <http://www.w3.org/2012/sysapps/app-uri/>, Scheduler API <http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-task-scheduler-20141202/>, TCP UDP Sockets <http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-tcp-udp-sockets-20141202/>. Furthermore, the members do not object to moving these specs to Community Groups where other Community Groups or anyone outside W3C would be allowed to take and develop them (as allowed by the Community Group Contributor License Agreement). However, if someone later asks the Director to allow these specifications to be moved, we expect that it is first be determined if Web Apps would like to pick the specs up.
Received on Thursday, 26 March 2015 19:49:32 UTC