Re: Next step of task scheduler API spec

Hi. Jungkee!
Could you update the status for below email? I would like to bring task
schedule API to LCWD as far as we can! ;-) Thanks in advance!

Kr, Wonsuk.
 2014. 8. 12. 오후 5:29에 "Wonsuk Lee" <wonsuk73@gmail.com>님이 작성:

> Jungkee.
> Do you have any update on your work for ServiceWorker? It would be
> excellent if task scheduler spec can go to next step with
> ServiceWorkerRegistration interface soon!
>
> Kr, Wonsuk.
>
>
> 2014-07-22 13:53 GMT+09:00 Jungkee Song <jungkees@gmail.com>:
>
>> On Jun 27, 2014 2:38 AM, "Marcos Caceres" <w3c@marcosc.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > On June 26, 2014 at 1:32:13 PM, Wonsuk Lee (wonsuk73@gmail.com) wrote:
>> > > Hi. Chris and Marcos.
>> > > Thanks for quick reply!
>> > >
>> > > When is proper timing to integrate task scheduler spec with
>> ServiceWorker?
>> > > We already have FPWD for ServiceWorker. Is not enough to do
>> integration
>> > > work?
>> >
>> > Never too late to start thinking about how to do it. Problem is that
>> the underlying architecture for SW is unstable and unproven so the "right
>> way" too hook in ScheduleTasks is still a bit unclear.
>> >
>>
>> It seems this design has got a consensus:
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2014JulSep/0081.html
>>
>> I think I'll be able to get back with a section for the extension guide
>> in the ServiceWorker spec in a few weeks.
>>
>> Note that ServiceWorkerRegistration interface in the sited discussion has
>> not been added in the spec yet.
>>
>> > --
>> > Marcos Caceres
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> =========================================
> 이 원 석 (Wonsuk, Lee) / Principal Engineer, Ph.D
> SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS Co., LTD. (三星電子)
> Mobile: +82-10-5800-3997
> E-mail: wonsuk11.lee@samsung.com, wonsuk73@gmail.com
> http://www.wonsuk73.com/, twitter: @wonsuk73
> -----------------------------------------
> Inspire the World, Create the Future !!!
> =========================================
>