Re: Regarding to Application Lifecycle and Events spec

Hi. Marcos.
Thanks a lot for quick reply again!

2014-06-27 2:27 GMT+09:00 Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>:

>
>
> On June 26, 2014 at 11:08:35 AM, Wonsuk Lee (wonsuk73@gmail.com) wrote:
> > Hi. Annsi and Kenneth.
> > Could you share your opinions for direction of Application Lifecycle and
> > Events[1] spec? FPWD of ServiceWorker spec was released, so I would like
> > to discuss on that.
>
> (not that anyone asked me, but... ;)) I think the coverage of this spec is
> fine for a FPWD, but I think we should hold till Service Workers stabilizes
> a little bit more. Once we gain a bit more experience with SWs in the wild,
> we should be in a better position to evaluate exactly what is needed.
> Mozilla and Google are aiming to have SWs out the door in one form or
> another by Sept., which is not that long from now.
>

Oaky! Agreed! But I would like to have opinions from editors and group
members. We don't need to clarify more about current use cases and
requirements. In addition, how about functions from them?

Kr, Wonsuk.



-- 

=========================================
ÀÌ ¿ø ¼® (Wonsuk, Lee) / Principal Engineer, Ph.D
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS Co., LTD. (ß²àøï³í­)
Mobile: +82-10-5800-3997
E-mail: wonsuk11.lee@samsung.com, wonsuk73@gmail.com
http://www.wonsuk73.com/, twitter: @wonsuk73
-----------------------------------------
Inspire the World, Create the Future !!!
=========================================

Received on Thursday, 26 June 2014 17:47:28 UTC