Re: W3C Working Draft for Data Store API

Hi Charles,

Thanks Charles for the feedback. Please see the in-line.

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Charles McCathie Nevile" <chaals@yandex-team.ru>
> To: public-sysapps@w3.org, "Gene Lian" <clian@mozilla.com>
> Cc: "Ehsan Akhgari" <ehsan@mozilla.com>, "Andrew Overholt" <overholt@mozilla.com>, "Jonas Sicking" <jonas@sicking.cc>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 8:23:34 PM
> Subject: Re: W3C Working Draft for Data Store API
> 
> Hi Gene,
> 
> On Wed, 22 Jan 2014 11:48:48 +0100, Gene Lian <clian@mozilla.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi SysApps,
> >
> > I've been working out a W3C working draft for the Data Store API,
> > which is aimed to solve the issue that the Messaging API and
> > the Contacts API might be facing: it's hard to define a general
> > DB schema for searching/filtering messages/contacts.
> >
> >   http://airpingu.github.io/data-store-api/index.html
> >
> > I also made a github for it in my personal space (maybe it's better
> > to move it to somewhere more formal):
> >
> >   https://github.com/airpingu/data-store-api
> >
> > Hope this can get noticed and please feel free to fire issues or
> > questions about this draft.
> 
> A couple of minor comments:
> 
> There isn't a "published W3C version", so please remove that link.

Fire https://github.com/airpingu/data-store-api/issues/14

> 
> It is pretty unclear how this relates to other work on storage (local
> storage, indexedDB, etc etc) - that would be a really useful addition to
> the draft.

Indeed, that's the next step I have to do: to add more words to
emphasize the role of DataStore API about how it plays differently
from Storage/IndexedDB APIs.

Fire https://github.com/airpingu/data-store-api/issues/15

The following link shows an informal description about that:

https://wiki.mozilla.org/WebAPI/DataStore#Why_not_use_specific_APIs_for_the_use-cases_like_the_existing_Contacts_and_SMS.2FMMS_APIs.3F

> 
> In the references, the HTML5 editors are just that, not authors (the
> authors are nominally the working group, who in both theory and practice
> make concrete decisions about the content). Please add something (e.g.
> "{authors} (eds.)" to indicate that.

Which part are you mentioning? Could you please point it out? Thanks!

Cheers,
Gene

Received on Tuesday, 28 January 2014 08:26:48 UTC