- From: John Mellor <johnme@google.com>
- Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2013 14:01:42 +0000
- To: Wonsuk Lee <wonsuk11.lee@samsung.com>
- Cc: Michael van Ouwerkerk <mvanouwerkerk@chromium.org>, public-sysapps@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAG_kaUY2c67gTYC97QguCnC4shMhWwZfDv8FnmfC6h9iqcnUSQ@mail.gmail.com>
> we need to clarify use cases in terms of less time sensitive case. Non-time-sensitive background tasks could work well for syncing data in the background for later viewing offline: - Social network stream - Feed reader - Weather app fetching forecast for your location - Maps caching nearby map tiles - etc Meanwhile, the only use cases I can come up with for time-sensitive tasks are: - Calendar event notifications - Alarm clock - Countdown timer (egg timer) And in all 3 of these cases a user-visible notification will be shown, which I why I suggested the split in: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sysapps/2013Nov/0039.html Do you have other use cases for time-sensitive tasks that wouldn't involve showing a user-visible notification? On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 1:20 PM, Wonsuk Lee <wonsuk11.lee@samsung.com> wrote: > Hi. Michael. > > Thanks for interesting feedback. As a first stage, it seems we need to > clarify use cases in terms of less time sensitive case. > > > > Kr, Wonsuk. > > > > *From:* mvanouwerkerk@google.com [mailto:mvanouwerkerk@google.com] *On > Behalf Of *Michael van Ouwerkerk > *Sent:* Tuesday, November 05, 2013 10:36 PM > *To:* public-sysapps@w3.org > *Subject:* [Task Scheduler] scheduling flexibility > > > > How do people feel about allowing for scheduling flexibility in the Task > Scheduler API? The goal of this feature would be to save battery power. If > the system has flexibility about when to precisely run a task, it could > batch multiple tasks together, or only run tasks when the device is awake. > This way, we could avoid waking up devices too frequently. > > > > Some use cases require precise scheduling e.g. an alarm in the morning, or > a cooking timer. But there are many tasks that are much less time > sensitive, these could be scheduled flexibly e.g. syncing a news feed or > auto-updating to a new version. > > > > Any comments? My apologies if this issue has been discussed previously. > > > > Regards, > > > > Michael van Ouwerkerk > > >
Received on Thursday, 7 November 2013 14:02:29 UTC