RE: CfC: publish FPWD of "app: URI scheme"; deadline April 26th

Mounir, Marcos,
I appreciate all the efforts that Marcos has gone through, in particular sorting through the detailed feedback I provided on the doc.  I agree we need to move this forward and get this to FPWD soon.

I believe we are at an impasse on one issue prior to releasing to FPWD:  how to handle Section 6.4.  My latest proposal is that the text be marked as non-normative (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sysapps/2013Apr/0230.html).  I don't believe Marcos is in agreement.  So I'll propose the following change:

Change

" To dereference a app: URI to a file in a app package a user agent MUST apply the rules for dereferencing an app: URI. "

to

" To dereference a app: URI to a file in a app package a user agent SHOULD apply the rules for dereferencing an app: URI. ", where SHOULD is as per RFC 2119.

-Giri

-----Original Message-----
From: Mounir Lamouri [mailto:mounir@lamouri.fr] 
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2013 8:17 AM
To: Marcos Caceres
Cc: Mandyam, Giridhar; public-sysapps@w3.org; wonsuk11.lee@samsung.com; Dave Raggett
Subject: Re: CfC: publish FPWD of "app: URI scheme"; deadline April 26th

On 09/05/13 16:15, Marcos Caceres wrote:
> 
> 
> On Thursday, May 9, 2013, Mounir Lamouri wrote:
> 
>     Hi Giri,
> 
>     Are your concerns about this document moving to FPWD solved?
> 
> 
> I've addressed all the issues Giri raised. Detailed record of changes 
> can be found on GH (as normal, each bug is linked to a change set).

Sounds great! Could you prepare the document to be published?

I would still prefer Giri to confirm that he has no more objection with this specification moving to FPWD.

Thanks,
--
Mounir

Received on Thursday, 9 May 2013 16:33:37 UTC