Re: Duplicate ID in runtime specification

2013. 3. 20. ¿ÀÈÄ 11:15¿¡ "Dave Raggett" <dsr@w3.org>´ÔÀÌ ÀÛ¼º:
>
> John's list will be useful as we prepare a fresh draft, but I wasn't sure
whether it reflects a group consensus. We needed something concise for the
SOTD for tomorrow's FPWD. More details on issues are better placed inline
in the document as Marcos proposed, and I would encourage the editors to do
so for the next draft.

Thanks for clarification, I agree that inline issues will be better.

Regards,
Ming Jin

Received on Thursday, 21 March 2013 09:35:39 UTC