- From: Hsin-Yi Tsai <htsai@mozilla.com>
- Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 17:10:37 +0800
- To: "Kis, Zoltan" <zoltan.kis@intel.com>
- CC: "public-sysapps@w3.org" <public-sysapps@w3.org>
Hi all, On 2013¦~04¤ë02¤é 18:22, Kis, Zoltan wrote: > Hello, > >> ICC ID seems the proper one used for the service Id. > Yes, it is one proper way, however, I think it should not be mandatory > (some implementations may choose different id name space, likely > mapped to the ICC-ID). > >>> For now, I suggest we remove the constraint, but don't support fetching the MSISDN through the Telephony API. IMO it should be a functionality exposed in the (future) separate TelephonyService API. >> The suggestion sounds good to me and I also support having a separate service API (in the future, maybe ;-) ). > I have fixed the bug in the spec along these lines, see > http://telephony.sysapps.org/ . > Thank you for raising the issue. Looks good to me. :) > If you see any other inconsistencies, please share. Another concern: for cellular telephony, what would serviceId/defaultServiceId be when there's no SIM card inserted at all? Even no SIM card inserted, user should be able to make a call (emergency call). We need to make sure the API allows that. I am not sure whether this issue has been discussed before or is still under discussion, but I do want to share my concern since I cannot tell from the proposal. Best regards, Hsinyi -- Hsin-Yi Tsai ½²ªY©y Mozilla Taiwan T: +886-2-87861100 ext:312 htsai@mozilla.com
Received on Wednesday, 3 April 2013 09:11:13 UTC