Re: updated draft charter

On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 12:54 PM, Carr, Wayne <wayne.carr@intel.com> wrote:

> We support adding back those deliverables.  We need to do is decide on
> what to present to the AC and Director as the limits of the scope and I
> don't see any reason those specs should be out of scope.
>
> The WG can drop or defer specs if the WG decides not to work on them.
>  That's much simpler than adding them.  I'm just not seeing why we'd be
> more capable of deciding that for them.
>

Is it possible to word the draft so that it is possible to add new work on
yet to be named APIs without rechartering? For example, under phase 2:

"Other APIs that adhere to the Goals and the Scope of the charter and which
do not directly conflict with the chartered deliverables of another Working
Group."