- From: Carr, Wayne <wayne.carr@intel.com>
- Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 18:54:36 +0000
- To: Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>, W3C SysApps <public-sysapps@w3.org>
We support adding back those deliverables. We need to do is decide on what to present to the AC and Director as the limits of the scope and I don't see any reason those specs should be out of scope. The WG can drop or defer specs if the WG decides not to work on them. That's much simpler than adding them. I'm just not seeing why we'd be more capable of deciding that for them. >-----Original Message----- >From: Dave Raggett [mailto:dsr@w3.org] >Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2012 10:17 AM >To: W3C SysApps >Subject: updated draft charter > >Following the discussion that it should be up to the working group to prioritize >work items even if this means that not all of them are completed within the two >year initial charter period. I have added back the deliverables that were dropped >when splitting them into phase one and two. The phase two deliverables are now >listed in alphabetical order. If you feel we should drop one or more deliverables, >this is now a good time to argue your case before we proceed to the AC Review. > >We are looking for horizontal reviews of the draft charter from the perspectives >of security, privacy, accessibility and internationalization. > >-- >Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> http://www.w3.org/People/Raggett
Received on Tuesday, 5 June 2012 18:55:21 UTC