Re: Reviewing our issues

1. My vote goes for Synchronized Narration.

2. I think the word "Narration" already refers, in some way, to the central theme of Publishing, so I don't think adding that term is necessary.

Ivan

——
Ivan Herman

(Written on my iPad. Excuses for brevity and misspellings...)

> On 12 Nov 2019, at 22:14, Marisa DeMeglio <marisa.demeglio@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Ok, let’s try this again - issue #24 is about naming. We should pick a name because audiobooks is likely going to CR, and our note is referenced by that spec. I do understand that as a CG note, we can rename our document with little consequence, but as we will be referenced informatively by a rec track document, it would be really nice to choose now and stick with it.
> 
> Based on this issue: 
> https://github.com/w3c/sync-media-pub/issues/24
> 
> I see these options:
> 
> Synchronized Media 
> Synchronized Narration
> Synchronized Alternative Media
> 
> Any of them could be appended with “for Publications”.
> 
> Let’s vote. Please indicate:
> 
> 1. Which of the three choices you like the most. 
> 2. Whether you prefer to append with “for Publications” or not 
> 
> We don’t need new ideas or other variations at this point. We’re a small group, so your one vote could change everything!! Voting closes by the end of this week (Nov 15 end of day in California).
> 
> Thanks
> Marisa
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> On Oct 11, 2019, at 15:07, Marisa DeMeglio <marisa.demeglio@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Yep, that was the idea! And I see that it worked - thanks for chiming in.
>> 
>> And now for something completely different — I won’t call it baseurl but … 
>> https://github.com/w3c/sync-media-pub/issues/26
>> 
>> Marisa
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Oct 11, 2019, at 01:30, Romain <rdeltour@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Stirring up participation with a bikeshedding naming issue, I see what you did there… well played (grin).
>>> 
>>> More seriously, +1 to using GitHub directly. Possibly with an email reminder from time to time for pressing issues which lack any comments.
>>> 
>>> Best,
>>> Romain.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On 10 Oct 2019, at 23:03, Marisa DeMeglio <marisa.demeglio@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hi all,
>>>> 
>>>> I plan to work in the coming days and weeks on resolving the remaining issues in our tracker, and cleaning up the draft reports. 
>>>> 
>>>> I’d also like to engage the CG more as I do this work. Does it work best to discuss the issues on this list, or would it be preferable to use the github tracker directly?
>>>> 
>>>> Here’s the first issue. It’s a relatively easy one, I think:
>>>> https://github.com/w3c/sync-media-pub/issues/24
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Marisa
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>