Re: Reviewing our issues

“Any of them could be appended with “for Publications”.”

Avneesh: The main reason behind having a separate CG for this work was to prevent the perception that sync media is specific to publishing, and it has broader use on the web. 
It is possible that sync media gets more traction for use cases other than publishing, and it is also possible that we do not get sufficient traction. But in both the cases it would be safer to avoid publishing in the name.

For current specification, sync narration looks quite appropriate.
With regards
Avneesh
From: Marisa DeMeglio 
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2019 2:44
To: W3C Synchronized Multimedia for Publications CG 
Subject: Re: Reviewing our issues

Ok, let’s try this again - issue #24 is about naming. We should pick a name because audiobooks is likely going to CR, and our note is referenced by that spec. I do understand that as a CG note, we can rename our document with little consequence, but as we will be referenced informatively by a rec track document, it would be really nice to choose now and stick with it. 

Based on this issue: 
https://github.com/w3c/sync-media-pub/issues/24

I see these options:

Synchronized Media 
Synchronized Narration
Synchronized Alternative Media

Any of them could be appended with “for Publications”.

Let’s vote. Please indicate:

1. Which of the three choices you like the most. 
2. Whether you prefer to append with “for Publications” or not 

We don’t need new ideas or other variations at this point. We’re a small group, so your one vote could change everything!! Voting closes by the end of this week (Nov 15 end of day in California).

Thanks
Marisa





  On Oct 11, 2019, at 15:07, Marisa DeMeglio <marisa.demeglio@gmail.com> wrote:

  Yep, that was the idea! And I see that it worked - thanks for chiming in. 

  And now for something completely different — I won’t call it baseurl but …  
  https://github.com/w3c/sync-media-pub/issues/26

  Marisa




    On Oct 11, 2019, at 01:30, Romain <rdeltour@gmail.com> wrote:

    Stirring up participation with a bikeshedding naming issue, I see what you did there… well played (grin). 

    More seriously, +1 to using GitHub directly. Possibly with an email reminder from time to time for pressing issues which lack any comments.

    Best,
    Romain.





      On 10 Oct 2019, at 23:03, Marisa DeMeglio <marisa.demeglio@gmail.com> wrote:

      Hi all, 

      I plan to work in the coming days and weeks on resolving the remaining issues in our tracker, and cleaning up the draft reports. 

      I’d also like to engage the CG more as I do this work. Does it work best to discuss the issues on this list, or would it be preferable to use the github tracker directly?

      Here’s the first issue. It’s a relatively easy one, I think:
      https://github.com/w3c/sync-media-pub/issues/24

      Thanks
      Marisa