Re: wsdl ontology

Perfect!
Thank you very much ^_^
Romina

On 10/15/07, Jacek Kopecky <jacek.kopecky@deri.at> wrote:
>
> Dear Romina,
> the main intent for the WSDL RDF ontology is basically to provide an RDF
> view on WSDL documents - using an implementation of the transformation
> described at w3.org/TR/wsdl20-rdf (one Java implementation is mentioned
> at [1], but it can probably be implemented using XSLT as well), a SemWeb
> agent will be able to integrate the WSDL data with its other RDF data.
>
> To respond to your concrete points:
>
> 1) many properties in the WSDL RDF ontology have only ranges because the
> ontology is intended to be reusable outside its main purpose - if you
> want to attach a WSDL interface to something, you don't need to create a
> new property, just reuse wsdlrdf:interface. In general, domains and
> ranges clarify and/or restrict the use of properties, but they limit the
> unexpected reusability.
>
> 2) an example usage is combining WSDL data with any other RDF data on
> the Semantic Web, or even just with other WSDL data in a WSDL repository
> built on RDF.
>
> Since the WSDL RDF ontology is an RDF view of WSDL data, you do not have
> to point to it from WSDL; any WSDL can be automatically transformed to
> the RDF form.
>
> Hope it helps,
> Jacek
>
> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2007May/0043.html
>
> On Mon, 2007-10-15 at 12:35 +0200, romina pallandrini wrote:
> > Dear Group,
> >    I have some question about the wsdl ontology[1] :
> >
> > 1) for a lot of properties it is defined only the range. Why?
> >
> > 2) what is an example of the usage of this ontology? I have to refer
> > to wsdl-rdf from a WSDL maybe using SAWSDL?
> >
> > Apologies if this is not the correct newsgroup to send this
> > question to.
> >
> >
> > Thank you in advance
> > Romina
> >
> > [1] www.w3.org\ns\wsdl-rdf
>
>