W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sws-ig@w3.org > July 2007

Re: SAWSDL in WXMO-MX [was Re: Commercial/Real-world Semantic Web Services?]

From: Carine Bournez <carine@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 10:01:55 -0400
To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@isr.umd.edu>
Cc: Matthias Klusch <klusch@dfki.de>, public-sws-ig@w3.org
Message-ID: <20070706140155.GI16158@homer.w3.org>

Hi Bijan, all,
On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 02:22:13PM +0100, Bijan Parsia wrote:
> If I may present a slightly different take:
> 	When SAWSDL finishes, what's next for SWS at the W3C?
> I.e., is it just evangalism now? Is there future standards work? Do  
> we need/want an XG? A WG? To do what exactly.
> WSDL also went to recommendation(finally! whew!), and WS-Policy is  
> proceeding. So, swsers...what do we want/think should be done?

good question for sure :)

> It is reasonable, I think. There are three possibilities, I think:
> 	1) Have a meeting at the Tech plenary in Nov in Boston.
> 	Pros: lots of w3c interaction; SW-IG had meetings to good effect 
> 	there
> 	Cons: Awkward wrt ISWC; far for a lot of major SWS players; may be  
> too late to get a slot
> 	http://www.w3.org/2002/09/TPOverview.html

It is certainly possible to have a BOF there but that means a short
meeting for a small subset of SWS people. Maybe not sufficient.

> 	2) Have a workshop associated with a conference (such as ISWC)
> 	Pros: some flexibility; if we pick the right conference, lots of  
> players might go; ISWC folks might host; there are WS conferences  
> that could produce some synergy
> 	Cons: Often academically biased; ISWC itself is far for lots of  
> people and the formal workshop application is closed so would have to  
> do something ad hoc

You may want to contact some W3C SW folks there in any case, to get
the "non-WS" impression.

> 	3) Have a W3C follow up workshop to the one on Frameworks for  
> Semantics in WS:
> 	http://www.w3.org/2005/01/ws-swsf-cfp
> 	Pros: It's been two years; often a lot of W3C engagement; flexible  
> (even could be coloed with a conference)
> 	Cons: Needs a host; don't know if the W3C would be interested

I think we could organize a second workshop after the XG terminates its
work, there could be a presentation of results and then a debate.
I also hope to see more discussion in this mailing list in the next
few weeks/months.

Carine Bournez -+- W3C Europe
Received on Friday, 6 July 2007 14:01:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:33:00 UTC