- From: Carine Bournez <carine@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 13:17:09 +0200
- To: merrychang79 <merrychang79@163.com>
- Cc: public-sws-ig@w3.org
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 04:52:02PM +0800, merrychang79 wrote: > > Hello Everybody, > > Both OWL-S and WSMO could be used to annotate the service to realize the automatic service discovery, composition and excecution. > But which one will be better or promissing as a standard upper ontology for service? Merry, You may find useful information in the report from the workshop held in 2005. http://www.w3.org/2005/04/FSWS/workshop-report.html The SAWSDL Working Group has been created to work on a semantic annotation mechanism in WSDL 2.0, see [1]. A charter for a characterization Group [2] had been written and no clear support for further work has been expressed so far. [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/04/FSWS/workshop-report.html [2] http://www.w3.org/2005/10/sws-charac-charter.html -- Carine Bournez -+- W3C Europe
Received on Wednesday, 13 September 2006 11:17:45 UTC