- From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@isr.umd.edu>
- Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 12:41:47 -0500
- To: "Shi, Xuan" <xshi@GEO.WVU.edu>
- Cc: "'''public-sws-ig@w3.org ' ' '" <public-sws-ig@w3.org>, "''Carine Bournez ' '" <carine@w3.org>
On Mar 16, 2006, at 12:37 PM, Shi, Xuan wrote: > Bijan, > > Thanks for your comments. I'd be happy to show you the nakedness of > OSRR so > you can examine it at anywhere by any approach. I have. > At least I am glad to see > you agree now OSRR is not just an assertion or lier Except I never said any of this. I've extensively critiqued your negative assertions about WSDL and your crazed "arguments" in support of those assertions. > but can be implemented > by either SOAP or REST services without confusion and obscurity. And this is just incoherent. I'm still waiting for you to understand how WSDL works wrt multiple bindings (HTTP *and* SOAP...in the same document....with an abstract view....see the SPARQL protocol). You need to stop claiming victory and start actually reading and understanding. Cheers, Bijan.
Received on Thursday, 16 March 2006 17:42:01 UTC